My suggestion about the duel system

[Satellite's Shooting Star]

it is that we should have a system where when two people duel they dont give up any mc but instead who ever wins gets 20 mc and the loser loses nothing but dignity

[RogueShadow]

You lost a big duel didn't you kaiba

[Satellite's Shooting Star]

um noo

[Chains357]

Nah fuck that noise. People need to lose MC when they lose.

Fuck that '''everybody wins nobody loses anything'' weak man crap.

People need to know that it pays to be a winner.

[Satellite's Shooting Star]

eh whatever how bout if they lose they lose some points

[Stardog]

"How about if they lose, they lose points."

That's what's called a money match. Both players bet a certain amount of credit and whoever has lost that money match, loses their credits. Which we have already implemented.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[Khina Bree]

Exactly.

I'm not into the idea of rewarding people just for dueling

[Flip Flapper]

if you got MC without any risk then youd just do several of these duels in a row and get rich

[Pyro]

Exactly.

I'm not into the idea of rewarding people just for dueling

Rewarding people for random posting is cool but rewarding people for just casual dueling in a yugioh academy is bad? I think its a good idea to have things such as battle arenas where 2 people duels and the winner gains x amount of MC (lets say 10MC for the sake of arguments) and gets 1 win in their profile record whereas the loser dont lose anything other than have a loss on their BA profile record.

[Oriana]

Rewarding people for random posting is cool but rewarding people for just casual dueling in a yugioh academy is bad? I think its a good idea to have things such as battle arenas where 2 people duels and the winner gains x amount of MC (lets say 10MC for the sake of arguments) and gets 1 win in their profile record whereas the loser dont lose anything other than have a loss on their BA profile record.

Posting shows that you are being active in the academy's features and activities, and talking with people. Dueling rewards you by being a better duelist than your opponent. Besides, if there wasnt a punishment system for the losers, people would just spam duels with each other to accumulate points, because it wouldnt matter who the loser was. they dont lose any points, and the winner gets points? eventually both participants would have stupid amounts of points because the loser wouldnt lose anything. there is no punishment, or incentive to improve.

[Pyro]

Rewarding people for random posting is cool but rewarding people for just casual dueling in a yugioh academy is bad? I think its a good idea to have things such as battle arenas where 2 people duels and the winner gains x amount of MC (lets say 10MC for the sake of arguments) and gets 1 win in their profile record whereas the loser dont lose anything other than have a loss on their BA profile record.

Posting shows that you are being active in the academy's features and activities, and talking with people. Dueling rewards you by being a better duelist than your opponent. Besides, if there wasnt a punishment system for the losers, people would just spam duels with each other to accumulate points, because it wouldnt matter who the loser was. they dont lose any points, and the winner gets points? eventually both participants would have stupid amounts of points because the loser wouldnt lose anything. there is no punishment, or incentive to improve.

Then use your brain and make up a rule saying 2 same people can duel each other once every 2 or 3 days. (BA duel). Like I don't understand why people nowadays sees a problem and straight away backs off calling it a bad idea without putting any thoughts in it. 

If i BA you and win OR lose, next time i can BA you again is 3 days later minimum. I don't see what is the big deal about giving virtual number currency. Only "problem" would be that the mods will have to look at the BA thread where the screenshot of the winner will be then award it by adding the MC, which shouldn't be a big deal. This academy is no where near competitive so its not valid when you say "there is no punishment or incentive to improve". This is suppose to be a casual duel anyway. The punishment you are getting is the loss record on your profile which meant the loss counted that leads to many wanting to duel more and make their record better by winning, thus improving. There is no reason to shut down an idea before trying it.

They won't have "stupid amount" of points as long as you don't award ridiculous amount MC as reward. So offer 10 MC per win with the rule of no 2 same people can duel each other until 3 days are over and it wont go wild. Hardly anyone even accepts casual duels when asked on chat except like 1 or 2. This will give others a reason to duel, so they can get MC. If getting 100MC by winning 10 times vs 10 different people or same 4 different people in 6 days sounds stupid, then stupid is overrated. This slow flow of MC can lead to more people spending MC on signature, custom rank, glow, etc. Making them happy and promoting them to be more active as well.

Also I am not saying nor implying that the posting 3MC reward is bad and should be removed. It was a point of comparison where the point was that you get MC for posting but you don't get anything for casual dueling in a yugioh academy.

[Flip Flapper]

hmm, i can definantly see pyro´s point, i for one does not really mind wheter it gets implemented or not (unless it becomes my duty to monitor it, if it is so then i will do my best) but it is an interesting idea if we put such limitations

[Chains357]

At the end of the day. The current system in place isn't going to change because it is working fine.

If you wanna get MC go practice and get better.

''It pays to be a winner'' -Navy Seal BUDS Instructor Chief Taylor.

[Pyro]

Its not changing the current system lol, its adding a new thing to it. The system is working fine when it comes to having many posts and many people on chat. We just want something added in for more reward when it comes to casual duels.

[Sponsored content]